DBR (de Bellis Renatonis)

Sandbox - seeing how rules compare to history

Again this is ‘live’ blog and I will be updating it from time to time as I discover things. The date of the latest version is 25 March 2025.

The death of Gustavus Adolphus at the battle of Lützen

The acid test of any set of rules is whether they deliver a typical historical result in the same circumstances as a known historical event. Are distances travelled in the same sort of period, does fighting last as long as the historical event, does the progress of the fighting follow the historical events with regards to casualties, routs, retreats, units pushed back or surging forward? The main problem is finding a historical event, at a scale suitable for the wargames tables and rules, and with sufficient detail to make an evaluation, that seems to possess the same features as most other attacks. So many, well recorded historical events are recorded simply because they appeared to be an outlier, an exceptional event with an unusual outcome which makes it worth recording. Likewise, casualty results are often contentious, many soldiers are not killed during the battle but rather during the retreat or units suffer desertion before the battle started. Finding a suitable example with sufficient historical detail and possibly backed up by archaeology, is challenging, especially from the earlier periods when printed records are less common.

Lützen (1632)

Cornelis Danckerts - Battle of Lützen as seen from the Imperial side however the depiction of the Imperial deployment is incorrect and outdated.

For the Thirty Years War period, one of the most studied battles is Lützen (1632), for the simple reason that the Swedish king, Gustavus Adolphus, was killed during the battle. This momentous event meant that eye witness accounts were recorded and disseminated and the events of the battle were recoded in great detail. There has been considerable later historical research with the Swedish General Staff conducting a detailed study of the battle and there has been an archaeological study of the battlefield in 2023. We have quite detailed knowledge about the events of the battle, particularly the death of Gustavus Adolphus.

The mist that hung over the battlefield that day, resulted in two events, firstly the Swedish cavalry on the right of the line conducted its own attack on the Isolano Croats, fake troops and Imperial baggage and got separated from the rest of the battle. Only the Småland Horse stayed in the locale of the infantry together with the King. Secondly, the four Swedish brigades that made up the first line, split apart and made two separate attacks on the Imperialist line. The Swedish and Yellow (Guards) Brigades on the right of the Swedish line deviated off to the right and attacked the Imperial brigades of Breuner and Comargo with the seven Imperial guns. It’s this discreet action that we are going to use as our example to test against variou sets of rules to see how they perform.

  • 10:30 am the Swedish army had finished deploying north of the canal and the attack started with the right wing cavalry moving off first to drive away the Croats

  • 11.00 am Gustavus reached the bend in the road. The Småland Horse was either delayed by the ditch alongside the road or  by the fire of the seven gun battery

  • 11.30am the Swedish Brigade (1,581) and Yellow Brigade (1,220) arrived at and crossed the road. They seize the Imperial guns driving off the commanded shot along the road

  • 12.00pm Imperial units started to counter attack with the Comargo (900) and Breuner (800) Brigades, Gotz cuirassiers (400), Piccolominimi harquebusiers (500) supported by the Baden (500) brigade from second line.

A gap now emerged in the Swedish front line as the Blue Brigade was drawn into the fighting on the left flank around Windmill Hill. With no cavalry to the right and no infantry to the left, the two Swedish brigades ar

  • A protracted struggle ensued around the guns with the Swedish brigade being caught in the flank by the Imperial harquebusiers and cuirassiers while engaged to its front

  • 1.15pm The Swedish and Yellow Brigades fell back having suffered at least half their strength as casualties.

Wilson, Peter H. Lützen. First edition. Great Battles (Oxford University Press). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2018.

So in summary, two Swedish brigades advance 1,200 meters from their starting point, against 7 guns with commanded shot and two Imperial brigades. Then you have the counter attack with an additional brigade coming up and the cuirassiers and harquebusiers able to attack the right flank of the Swedish brigade as the Swedish cavalry has disappeared into the mist and the Blue Brigade was drifted off to the left. The attack lasts from 11am until 1.30pm or 2 and a half hours. 2,800 Swedish Foot, fight 2,300 Imperial Foot and 900 horse and 7 guns of various sizes. In the area of the guns, the King runs into a body of Imperial cuirassiers and is initially wounded in the elbow by a pistol shot and then another shot to the back and he falls from his horse. Later Pappenheim’s cuirassiers sweep through this area and the wounded King is killed by a shot to the head and his body stripped.

Conclusion

Gottfried Heinrich Graf zu Pappenheim

Gottfried Heinrich Graf zu Pappenheim

Bernhard of Saxony

I quite enjoyed running this test with the various sets of rules, it was quite revealing playing the same ‘game’ back to back using different rule concepts.

What struck me, was how much the rule sets stuck to ‘standard’ wargaming concepts or mechanics without attempting to match historical type events. I am reminded of the battle of Naseby when the Parliamentary first line of Foot was pushed back onto the second line. When have you seen a set of rules that allows for that? Likewise, at Lützen the two Swedish brigades retreated onto their second line after their failed attack rather than being routed or destroyed. As always morale played a much greater role in early modern battles than in eighteenth or nineteenth ones, with their professional troops and stricter discipline and control mechanisms.

Powered by Squarespace